a.k.a. V.J.

Old Man Stuff


Situational Philosophy

Nothing to do. Nowhere to go. No one to be.

The three previous sentences express a concept I’ve come across in some Buddhist sources. The idea is that we have to free ourselves of thinking that we need to obtain something or become someone beyond the status quo in order to be satisfied. It is an antidote to what psychologists call the “hedonic treadmill” — the cycle of striving for something to fill an imagined void in our lives, experiencing only fleeting satisfaction when we get it, and then striving for a new thing to fill the next void.

I often remind myself of the “nothing to do, nowhere to go, no one to be” idea in times of stress or ennui. For the most part it sets my thinking down a more productive path. But if I’m being honest, I also find myself questioning how universal of a truth it really is.

Being in my mid-fifties, with grown-up children, and within shouting distance of retirement, it’s very easy for me to embrace the concept that I should stop striving so hard. I do, however, wonder what my life would have been like if I had stumbled across the idea and taken it to heart back when I was in my twenties. A lot of what I consider to be the best aspects of my life came about directly or indirectly because, as a younger man, I felt a gnawing need to accomplish things that I could be proud of, to see new places, and to change myself in ways that would enhance my self-esteem and standing among my peers. I was not always happy during those struggles, but I feel better off for having been through them. If I had forgone all of it because a Buddhist teaching persuaded me it was all pointless and vain, I suspect that would have resulted in a less-satisfactory life.

The counterargument, I guess, would be that if I had been more enlightened when I was younger, my definitions of happiness and self-worth would have evolved much differently. Perhaps, but I can’t help but think that the wisdom we see in any idea is very much dependent on how neatly it fits into our agendas at the moment. When I was young, restlessness benefitted me, so I told myself that avoiding complacency was a virtue. Now that I’m old, I feel like slowing down and my life options are much more limited, so I pat myself on the back for avoiding the hedonic treadmill.

Cynical? Sure, but cynicism is one philosophy that Young Me and Old Me can both agree on without reservation.



3 responses to “Situational Philosophy”

  1. That tenet isn’t the point of any Buddhist teaching I’ve come across. Their basic thrust is that we should all work to ensure all creatures are free from suffering. There’s a lot if emphasis on the now, and breathing, and not worrying about the future.
    It’s not so much “don’t make plans” but “do no harm”. And you’ve pretty much done that, which makes you a Good Person.

    Like

    1. My interpretation is that it’s about being free from attachments, which are the cause of suffering according to Buddhist teachings. Don’t be attached to doing a particular thing, because it might not work out; don’t be attached to a living in a specific place, since it might not always be possible for you to live there; don’t be attached to your own identity, because you will change in ways you can’t yet imagine. We can enjoy the things that are presently part of our lives without being attached to them.

      Like

  2. If you had pursued the “root hog or die” philosophy of your late teen years, you’d be riding motorcycles with JD

    Like

Leave a comment

About Me

Researcher. Marketer. Teacher. Father of adult children and dogs. 20th Century holdover. Central New York native. Long-suffering Buffalo Bills fan. History nerd. Traveler. Vintage advertising enthusiast. Hat wearer.

Newsletter